Candlestick phones were the first type of phones to reach ordinary homes, shops, offices and suchlike, although it was only the more affluent homes that made the somewhat up-market decision to go 'on the phone'. One of my better-off relatives went on the phone in the late 1920s or early 1930s.
The appearance of candlestick phones
Candlestick phones got their name by being tall and narrow, just like a candle in a candlestick. At the time when these phones came onto the market, candles for lighting were still in daily use in many homes.
Candlestick phones were in two parts with the mouthpiece at the top of the part reminiscent of a structure reminiscent of a candlestick.
The earpiece rested on a cradle when the phone was not in use and was lifted to the ear when in use.
The earliest candlestick phones such as the one in my husband's family had no dial, just a disk stating the number of the phone and other information on making the call. An example is shown in the fourth photograph.
The base of the later candlestick phones held a dial as shown in the photographs.
Where the phones had a dial, local calls could be dialled directly, but longer distance calls had to be made through the operator at the telephone exchange. To get hold of her, you dialled zero, always just called the letter 'O' not zero. "Dial O for operator" was a stock phrase.
My husband's parents' candlestick phone did not have a dial. Lifting the earpiece from its cradle attracted the attention of the operator - at least that was the idea. If she didn't answer - which was not uncommon if she was on another line or chatting, the caller would jiggle the cradle up and down repeatedly.
Once the operator answered, the caller simply gave her the number required. Once she had got it, she would say something like: "It's ringing for you, caller" or "You're through". She could if she so wished amuse herself by staying on the line and listening to the conversation. Callers could do nothing about this, however much they objected to it.
Post Office instructions on making and receiving a call
The Post Office thought it necessary to instruct callers on speaking clearly to the operator when using early phones. Instructions were as shown in the transcription in the boxes below where 'subscriber' is what we could call 'caller', and 'telephonist' is what we would call the 'operator'. (Try to ignore the sexist language which was completely normal at the time.)
How to ask the operator to get a phone number - instructions from the Post Office
[Having lifted the receiver] the subscriber should wait until he hears the telephonist saying "Number please?" and then speak CLEARLY and DISTINCTLY with the lips almost touching the mouthpiece. Then he should state the number required. FIRST the name of the Exchange and THEN the number.
[Greater care is necessary in speaking by telephone than in ordinary speech if mistakes are to be avoided.]
General Post Office, October 1921
Try as I may, I cannot say 4 the way the Post Office advised.
How to answer a call - instructions from the Post Office
The call should be answered promptly.
On taking off the receiver, the called subscriber should not say "Hullo*" of "who'se there?" but should immediately announce his name.
A householder would say: "Mr Thomas Brown speaking."
The maidservant: "Mr Brown's house."
Mr Brown at his office would say: "Brown & Co. Mr Thomas Brown speaking."
His clerk: "Brown & Co."
General Post Office, October 1921* 'Hullo' often appears in old books for what we know as 'Hello'.
How to end a call - instructions from the Post Office
The receiver should be replaced immediately the conversation is finished.
Subscribers having Private Branch Exchange lines [shared lines] should ensure
that adequate arrangements are made for PROMPT DISCONNECTION AT THE SWITCHBOARD.
Neglect to do this may result in serious inconvenience.
General Post Office, October 1921
It is interesting to see how much norms have changed over the years.
Disadvantages of candlestick phones
Quite apart from the fact that telephoning through the operator could be slow and often laborious, the phones themselves were awkward to use. Two hands were needed: one to hold the earpiece to the ear and the other to hold the mouthpiece to the mouth. This meant that one part of the phone had to be put down in order to write down messages.
One way round the problem was to mount the phone on the wall, but it was not easy to position so that its height was right for everyone.
The newer phones of the 1940s were far more convenient in that both the mouthpiece and the earpiece were in the same unit and could be rested on a surface or held in one hand, so freeing the other for dialling and taking down messages.