HOME    SEARCH   ALL TOPICS

Casual wards for the homeless in the past

This page decribes casual wards and explains some of the terms used for them and the poverty-stricken individuals who had to use them. The page goes on to consider the differences between casual wards and workhouses and the extremely basic provision in casual wards.

____

Extracted from the memoirs of the webmaster's mother (1906-2002) and edited by the webmaster with further research

What casual wards were

Casual wards were parish-run institutions which would accommodate homeless people from outside that parish free of charge but only for just one night. Then these individuals would be moved on to trudge to another casual ward in a different parish.

Other terms for casual wards: spikes and doss-houses

Casual wards were often known informally as 'spikes', possibly after the tool used there for rope-teasing.

A 'doss-house' was a derogatory term for a casual ward and any low-cost overnight accommodation such as those run by charities. The term continued to be used for some time after the end of casual wards to describe cheap, untidy or dirty accommodation, but it is seldom heard today.

Tramps, casuals and vagrants

A 'tramp' was the everyday word used by the public for the men who had to trudge - or tramp - from one casual ward to another for the next night's sleep and basic sustenance.

In the past, tramps were common daytime sights on the streets and in queues for a casual ward to open. They were clearly ill-nourished and usually in dirty, ragged clothes. People avoided them unless it was to offer them a few hours' work or unwanted clothes. After the end of casual wards, the 'tramp' term continued to be used to imply disrespect to an individual, but it is now out-dated.

In official documents the term tramp was not used; it was 'vagrant', 'casual' or even 'pauper'. In everyday speech, though, pauper and beggar were more used to describe the down-and-outs who sat in the street begging for money.

Difference and similarities between casual wards and workhouses

Main differences and similarities between casual wards and workhouses were:

• Whereas workhouses were for poverty-stricken local people - the emphasis being on local - casual wards were for the poverty stricken of no fixed address. This meant that no parish felt much of a responsibility for them which was why casual wards were even more basic than workhouses.

• Whereas poverty-stricken individuals lived in workhouses until such a time as they could find work and leave, inmates of casual wards were only permitted to stay one night, whereupon they had to get to a different casual ward. Their only means of transport was trudging - or tramping - to the next casual ward. This gave rise to their name as tramps.

• Inmates of casual wards, like those of workhouses, were expected to work for their keep, although there are some differences in the types of work that they were expected to do - see work in a workhouse and work in a casual ward.

• Conditions were extremely harsh in both workhouses and casual wards - but if anything worse in casual wards - see the daily schedule in casual wards and life in workhouses.

• I understand that the sleeping arrangements in a workhouse were different from those in a casual ward, but this may not necessarily always have been the case everywhere. If you know, please contact me. At Guildford spike, the inmates slept in locked cells. The photo shows the doors to the cells off a corridor.

The main corridor showing the doors of the cells. Photographed with permission in Guildford Spike

• Workhouses and casual wards were both normally on the same site along with the local hospital, known as the infirmary, but they were not necessarily in the same building.

• Both workhouses and casual wards were funded by their local parish and managed by its Board of Guardians.

• Workhouses would accept inmates at any time of day, but casual wards were closed during daytime. I could watch them lining up outside our local casual ward as I came home from school. I think they were allowed in at 7 o'clock, but I can't be sure. They looked such a ragged and impoverished bunch. In winter they were all shivering with the cold.

Food

The food supplied by casual wards was similar to the food in workhouses with the exception that inmates of casual wards were turned out before lunch. On leaving the casual ward (after undertaking the required work), the inmates - now tramps or vagrants - were given enough money for the most basic of food for the day, but for additional food or clothes they relied on charity or small-scale theft. Tramps' lives were hard - see the page on their daily schedule.

Were vagrants and tramps thieves and villains?

Tramps suffered from serious malnutrition and inadequate clothing, so it is not surprising that some turned to crime. Consequently they were often known in the community as rogues, thieves and villains and widely regarded with caution by the rest of the community. They were given a wide berth as potential criminals and were certainly regarded as the lowest of the low. They were even looked down on by the inmates of workhouses.

The management and funding of casual wards

Casual wards, like their associated workhouses, were managed locally by a Board of Guardians. For many years my uncle was chairman of our Board of Guardians for Edmonton.

Casual wards were a cost to the parish and it is likely that this was the excuse for their extremely basic standards.

Staffing and the tramp major

Day-to-day staffing of casual wards was in the hands of individuals known as 'majors' or 'tramp majors'.

According to Orwell, tramp majors were generally inmates from the workhouse who were paid for their work.

Rules and regulations in casual wards

Although posters of rules and regulations in workhouses are not hard to find in museums, similar posters are somewhat rare for casual wards. The following was generously supplied by Joe Staines from the effects of his father. It is too large for a website page, but you can read it by tap/clicking the following thumbnail or reading the transcript which follows it. It is worth reading. Below that are my comments on the poster:

• Although tramps were only allowed to stay for a single night, there seems to be no official period stated here about when they could return. George Orwell however, a few years previously and speaking for the wider London area, states that tramps were not allowed to return within a month. Probably this was at the discretion of the local Board of Guardians. Apparently tramps who returned too often were removed to a workhouse in another area.

• Note that although the inmates, which the poster refers to as casuals, were 'officially' provided with a clean towel after bathing, their clothes were merely disinfected. In practice it is doubtful how far the cleanliness of the towels and bedding were actually implemented. Again, see George Orwell's experience of bathing and washing.

• The poster states that the inmates had to pay towards their keep if they had as much as a shilling, whereas George Orwell gave the amount as eight pence (where 12 pence equalled a shilling). Was this inflation? Or did the local committee in 1936, now freed from national requirements, feel free to raise the amount?

• The date of 24th January 1936 shows that this particular casual ward was one of the last to close. It is difficult to find the actual date when workhouses and casual wards were legally required to close, but the The 1929 Local Government Act abolished the Boards of Guardians which managed them to be replaced by local committees, and this in turn affected workhouses and casual wards. Note that this poster was created by a Casual Poor Assistance Authority, not a Board of Guardians. Presumably local authorities had a certain amount of leniency over when and how to make the change. Clearly it was cheaper for them to delay as long as possible.

The end of casual wards: the Welfare State

Although casual wards and workhouses officially closed during the 1930s, they continued in various forms and with different names until the establishment of the welfare state, just after the Second World War.

If you can add anything to this page or provide a photo, I would be pleased if you would contact me.

Text and images are copyright

sources: early 20th century material      sources: ww2 home front and other material     contact
the webmaster/author/researcher/editor     privacy policy