ArrowrIcon Home icon

Random Observations pre-1960s


Corsets, as worn everyday by ordinary women, mid-20th Century

What everyday corsets looked like

The corsets in the photo are just like the ones my mother wore every day as part of her underwear. They were not intended to be glamour items and must have been intensely uncomfortable.

Corsets, as worn everyday by ordinary women in 1940s England ' not intended as a glamour item

Corsets, worn everyday by ordinary women. Photographed in the Imperial War Museum. Note the suspenders at the bottom for holding up stockings.

Corset hooks and eyes which were large and heavy weight metal in order to stop the corsets from bursting open

Corset hooks and eyes which were large and heavy weight metal in order to stop the corsets from bursting open

Corsets had suspenders at the bottom edge for a 'pairs' of stockings, as there were of course no tights. Presumably because of the 'pair' of suspenders, corsets were often referred to as a 'pair of corsets'. So even though the garment in the photo looks like - and is - a single item, corsets were always referred to in the plural. That is a woman wore corsets not a corset.

Why women wore corsets

My mother did say that corsets were good for keeping warm, but there must have been more comfortable ways to do that.

I suspect that women wore these corsets because, having been born in the early part of the 20th century, it was just something that they were expected to do. Certainly, in the 1940s and into the 1950s, they were readily available for purchase. Women didn't have to shop around for them - within of course the constraints of everything being in short supply during the Second World War and the years of austerity afterwards. When I was taken with my mother to buy her corsets, the shop assistant produced them immediately.

Corset stays

Sewn into what may look like vertical hems were what were known as 'stays'. These held the body into position.

The stays were thin strips of whalebone - genuine whalebone - which was strong and yet somewhat flexible. How flexible depended on the thickness of the stays. The stays came in various thicknesses and lengths to fit various types and sizes of corsets. They looked just like narrow strips of cream plastic.

Stays snapped on occasions, presumably when a woman bent down too vigorously or too often. Then new stays had to be sewn into the corsets. My knowledge of this comes from my Saturday job in a haberdashers in the mid 1950s while I was still at school.

Towards the end of my time at the haberdashers, strips of what looked like interlaced wire started coming in to take the place of whalebone.

Corsets and comfort/discomfort

These corsets must have been incredibly uncomfortable: They were pulled tightly round the body, from above the waist to the top of the legs and were held tightly in place with heavy-weight metal hooks and eyes. The position of the waist is shown in the top photo by the horizontal shiny ribbon.

I can only imagine that if a woman wanted to bend down for any reason, possibly to pick something up, she had to take a deep breath first and be prepared for some significant effort to flex the stays.

My mother even did her housework in her corsets.

Guest contribution

Corsets and physical work

Corsets were a sign of social class - or assumed social class and respectability. A strong corset forced an elegant style of movement, walk and getting out of chair.

As a child, I visited an old lady who was working in her garden. She had a special 'gardening' corset that had most of the bones taken out and was easier to move in. When someone suggested not wearing a corset at all, the horrified reply was "but what if the vicar came to visit me". The corset was a mystical symbol of respectability.

In the first part of the 20th century, kitchen maids were common. As they needed to move freely in their heavy work, they did not wear corsets - which reinforced the association between social class and corsets.

Betty who wishes to remain anonymous

The demise of corsets for everyday wear

In the 1940s and into the 1950s corsets were widely worn by women of my mother's age (ie. women born in the early 1900s). Then sometime in the 1950s 'roll-ons' came in. They had no stays. They held women less rigidly, but did claim to control bulging stomachs. They were made of a strong rubbery fabric that had to be rolled up and then unrolled onto the body. My mother did buy me a roll-on when I was a teenager, but its tight elastic fabric chafed my thighs and I only wore it once. Like my other teenage friends, I used a suspender belt to hold up my stockings.

Lace-up corsets

Most of the images of corsets on the internet show ones that close by drawing laces together, pulling them tightly and tying them. These were not everyday items - at least not for underwear for working women in the mid 20th Century. For a start, the women would not have been able to spend the time putting them on every morning and there would have been no-one to help with pulling the laces tightly and doing them up.

Lace-up corsets were primarily for titillative external wear and were worn by actresses and show-girls in the mid-20th Century. Corsets in Victorian times was another matter, outside the scope of this website.

Text and images are copyright

If you can add anything to this page or provide a photo, I would be pleased if you would contact me.

facebook icon twitter icon